Ethical Repercussions within the Justice System: A Case Study Analysis

Lesallan

Ohio Christian University

CJU1010 Introduction to Justice Systems (ONL24F1)

Dr. Quinn

July 16, 2024

Ethical Repercussions within the Justice System: A Case Study Analysis

Lesallan Bostron

Ohio Christian University

CJU1010 Introduction to Justice Systems (ONL24F1)

Dr. Quinn

July 16, 2024

Ethical Repercussions within the Justice System: A Case Study Analysis

The ethical repercussions within the justice system are multifaceted and complex. This discussion explores these ethical considerations. The focus is on a case study involving the use of a Confidential Informant (CI) and an undercover officer (UC) in a drug bust operation. According to Masters (2021), the use of Confidential Informants (CIs) and undercover officers (UCs) is a widespread practice in policing operations. However, ensuring that this practice is conducted ethically is crucial, as well as respecting the rights of all involved and considering the potential risks and repercussions (Masters, 2021). This thought underscores the ethical considerations discussed in this case study, highlighting the importance of balancing law enforcement strategies with ethical standards.

What if we lived in a world where the ends always justify the means? What would be the ethical implications of such a stance, particularly within the justice system? This discussion delves into these hypothetical questions, focusing on a case study involving the use of a Confidential Informant (CI) and an undercover officer (UC) in a drug bust operation.

Concerning confidential informants: Law enforcement agencies often employ Confidential Informants as a strategic tool to infiltrate criminal organizations. This practice, while not typically considered entrapment, does raise ethical questions. Entrapment involves coercion or force, which is not the case when a CI provides an opportunity for a crime to be committed. However, offering leniency for the CI’s crimes could incentivize them to entrap others, thus creating an ethical dilemma.

The case study presents a disparity in sentencing between the CI and the drug manufacturer. This disparity can be justified by the difference in their roles and the value of the information provided by the CI. However, it raises ethical questions about fairness and proportionality in sentencing, mainly when both individuals engage in the same criminal activity.

There are many protections under the law. Defendants’ rights, including the right to a fair trial, the right to counsel, and protection against self-incrimination, must be balanced against using CIs. The use of CIs should not infringe upon these rights, and any infringement would constitute a violation of the ethical standards of law enforcement.

Critical considerations include the community’s safety, the officers involved, and even the suspects. In this case, allowing the manufacture of methamphetamine to be completed could have resulted in an explosion, putting many lives at risk. On the other hand, intervening too early might not provide enough evidence for a conviction. This is a delicate balance that law enforcement must navigate.

While some might argue that drug use is a personal choice and, therefore, a victimless crime, it is essential to consider the broader societal impacts. Drug manufacturing and trafficking often involve violence and exploitation, and drug use can lead to addiction, broken families, and societal costs related to healthcare and crime.

The ethical implications of these issues are complex and can vary based on one’s personal beliefs and values. Open discussions about these topics are crucial to ensure our fair and effective justice system. This case study serves as a reminder of the intricate balance between law enforcement strategies and ethical considerations within the justice system.

In Christ,

Lesallan

References:

Masters, R. (2021). CJ: realities and challenges. McGraw-Hill Education.